MRU Institute for SoTL

Using and Interpreting Undergraduate Research Posters in the Literature Classroom

What if we paid more attention to inquiry as the creation of knowledge through scholarly conversation, with each other and with our primary and secondary sources, rather than focusing almost exclusively on how to record the “results” of inquiry in the research paper?

In an excellent example of a SoTL project which is also “scholarship of integration” (in that it integrates knowledge and pedagogy from various academic fields), Karen Manarin describes how she used research posters (typical of science and social science) to inspire a new approach to teaching literary research and to

  • make visible different moments in the process of literary research – to both students and instructor
  • allow students to create their own interpretations through creative and aesthetic choices
  • allow students to distill their main points and receive feedback before writing the traditional research paper
  • give students the opportunity and confidence to create something that would interest their peers as scholars

Manarin, K. (2016). Interpreting Undergraduate Research Posters in the Literature Classroom. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, the ISSOTL Journal, 4(1). Available at http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/128/80

Share

3 SoTL sessions at the upcoming CACSL conference, May 25-27 at MRU

This year, the TransCanada International Forum on SoTL, sponsored through the Institute for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, will be hosted in partnership with the 2016 Canadian Association of Community Service Learning conference, May 25-27 at Mount Royal University.  The Forum features 3 sessions with leading scholar Patti Clayton:

Session I (Wed, 9:00 – 12:00): Integrating Critical Reflection and Assessment to Generate, Deepen, and Document Learning
In this first of three opportunities to collaboratively explore Community Service-Learning and Community Engagement (CSL/CE) as the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) with practitioner-scholar Patti Clayton, we will focus our attention on designing critical reflection so as to both generate student learning and provide a basis for inquiry into the processes that support such learning. For over 15 years Patti and colleagues around the world have been refining a research grounded model for integrating critical reflection and assessment. This highly interactive session will invite participants to build on their work, co-create critical reflection assignments and rubrics that are well-aligned with shared learning goals, and begin to co-design SoTL questions and methods that tap critical reflection products and processes.

Throughout the session participants will be invited to identify colleagues in the room with similar interests and to explore possible collaboration during the lunch break.

Session II (Wed, 1:30 – 4:00): Revisioning SoTL for Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Who conducts SoTL? And whose learning is in question in SoTL? In this second in a series of three opportunities to collaboratively explore CSL/CE as the scholarship of teaching and learning, Patti Clayton and Janice Miller-Young will invite participants into an international conversation about broadening and deepening the meanings and the practices of SoTL, within and beyond CSL. Patti, Janice, and their colleague Peter Felten are advancing efforts to conceptualize and implement engaged pedagogies as spaces of co-teaching, co-learning, and co-generating knowledge and practice; and they are seeing in trends in this direction indications that it is time to revisit and revise Hutchings and Shulman’s seminal work defining SoTL. SoTL can be a powerful means of developing practitioner-scholars; improving teaching and learning; nurturing communities of inquiry and practice around shared commitments to learners and learning; and building bodies of knowledge, practice, and policy in support of same. To fulfill this potential in the context of engaged pedagogies and to retain its cutting edge orientation as scholarship, they suggest that SoTL can no longer be understood and enacted primarily by faculty as a vehicle to improve student learning and to produce scholarship by and for faculty. This highly interactive session will engage participants in revisioning SoTL in ways that honor CSL/CE’s foundational commitment that everyone involved teaches and learns and that leverage the questions, experiences, and learning of CSL/CE practitioner-scholars to help define the future of SoTL in CSL/CE.

At the end of the day participants will be invited to form pairs or small groups of potential collaborators and to engage in the rest of the conference accordingly (e.g., having meals together, meeting between sessions to share questions and insights).

Session III (Fri, 9:00 – 11:45): Continuing our own SoTL Journeys: Questions, Collaborators, and Next Steps
In this third opportunity to explore CSL/CE as SoTL with Patti and colleagues, we will reflect on related work we have encountered during the conference, examine Canadian examples, and further develop our own questions, collaborations, and inquiry methods. Participants will be invited to skim an article/chapter related to the SoTL interests shared by the pair/small group they formed on Wednesday (examples will be provided) and to bring a worksheet completed during the conference to the session as aids to focusing our time productively. The intended outcome of this concluding gathering in the series of 3 sessions is for participants to leave with specific ideas, collaborators, and next steps in their own journeys with CSL/CE as SoTL.

Share

MRU scholars presenting at #STLHE2015

A number of us from MRU are presenting at Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education conference next week.  Looking forward to the generative conversations that will occur!

Wed June 17, 12:00 pm, Seymour Room
Tuning in on Tacit Knowledge
Jennifer Boman, Genevieve Currie, Ron MacDonald, Janice Miller-Young, Michelle Yeo, Stephanie Zettel

Thurs June 18, 11:30 am, Seymour Room
Creating SoTL Concertos for Institutional Impact
Michelle Yeo representing MRU on a panel with colleagues from University of Calgary, University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, McMaster University, Western University, Brock University, and University of Waterloo

Fri June 19, 8:30 am, Salon 2
Tuning in to Original Undergraduate Research in Classroom Contexts
Karen Manarin, April McGrath, Miriam Carey

Fri June 19, 8:30 am, Cypress 1 Room
Writing and publishing your Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Janice Miller-Young on a panel with other CJSoTL editors Shannon Murray, Marilou Bélisle, and Beth Marquis

**also see the SoTL Canada blog for a schedule of other SoTL presentations and the SoTL Canada AGM

Share

Reminder: Next SoTL presentation Tuesday March 17 on Scaffolding Undergraduate Research

Effects of a Scaffolded Approach to Undergraduate Research
Presented by:
Karen Manarin, Departments of English and General Education
Miriam Carey, Academic Development Centre
April McGrath, Department of Psychology

If undergraduate research leads to significant learning gains, should it be available to all students as part of the regular curriculum? Karen Manarin, Miriam Carey and April McGrath explore the effects of a scaffolded approach to undergraduate research in a 4th year English class, a 1st year General Education class, and a 2nd year Psychology class in this collaborative scholarship of teaching and learning project.

 

Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Noon – 1:00 p.m.
Room Y324

No registration required — everyone welcome!
Come and join in the conversation about teaching and learning.

Share

highlights from the 2014 Banff Symposium on SoTL

We had a fantastic conference in Banff last week and many collaborative conversations about the value of interdisciplinary, the imperative of changing our teaching to address the big problems of today’s world, and the importance of collaborating with students.

Please see Margy’s “storify” from the twitter feed of our Symposium in Banff last week for twitter highlights:

https://storify.com/margymaclibrary/ssotl-2014-symposium-on-scholarship-of-teaching-an

and a few photos from the twitter feed below:

2014 twitter photos #ssotl14

Share

Teaching and Learning Exchange: Sept 25

The Institute for SoTL invites you to our first T&L Exchange presentation of the year:

Tales from the trenches: How 3rd year journalism students talk about research literacy learning as it relates to current and future practice

Sept 25, 12:30-1:30 in T107

This presentation investigates students’ learning and its connection to practice in a mandatory 3rd year journalism class focused on the development of research literacy skills. The intention is to describe how students make sense of the research literacy skills they are being taught (such as the identification of research methods and questions, sampling procedures and reading statistical information) in the context of their imaginary as students and potential journalists. In sum, this presentation intends to help unravel how students are making sense of experience in the classroom by using their feedback (as opposed to my assumptions as an instructor). In doing so I offer some empirical data about the complex process of student sense making as they negotiate their learning experiences as current and future practitioners.

Dr. Amanda Williams has been a part time instructor for the Faculty of Communication Studies at Mount Royal University since 2009. She teaches theory and research methods for the Journalism, Information Design and Public Relations programs. Her current research projects include an exploration of journalism student identity, discourses of sustainability in the Alberta oil sands, and the development of Massive Open On-line Courses (MOOCs) in Canada.

Share

Reading Through Connections: A phenomenographic study of student connections to scholarly text.

Thanks to Margy for sharing information about her presentation at the ISSoTL 2013 conference in Raleigh, NC earlier this month.  Margy received a Going Public Award for presenting this work:

The presentation focused on findings of the project which illuminated how students were reading a text while making connections.

Presentation: http://www2.mtroyal.ca/~mmacmillan/conf/ISSOTLreadingconnections.pptx

Handout: http://www2.mtroyal.ca/~mmacmillan/conf/issotl13.docx

Margy’s summary:

The presentation outlined a research project that sought to understand how students could connect their prior knowledge/experience to reading an academic article in their field. As making connections while reading is a central part of academic practice which is often unseen, and unknown to students, but which faculty expect them to do as part of their academic reading, I wanted to know what kinds of connections students could make to an academic text. Student responses to an in-class activity were analyzed using a phenomenographic approach.

While I found that students could and did make connections to both academic and personal knowledge, a more significant finding was that the connections revealed how students were reading the text and their varying focus between words and meaning. Some connections revealed a surface reading of the text while other demonstrated a deeper understanding of the meaning behind the words. These deeper connections provided evidence of deeper reading and understanding through the creation of analogies, through integration with professional practice and through critique of the article as an artifact of communication.

Share