MRU Institute for SoTL

Asking Bigger Questions in SoTL

“If SoTL is to engage faculty across the disciplinary spectrum, it must embrace all kinds of research, including focused, controlled studies that yield statistical analyses and projects that tell significant stories about student learning and that emphasize interpretation, process, creativity, and theory.”
Bloch-Schulman, S., Wharton Comkling, S., Linkon, S., Manarin, K., & Perkins, K. (2016). Asking Bigger Questions: An Invitation to Further Conversation. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, the ISSOTL Journal, 4(1).

Find this article and more in the latest issue of Teaching and Learning Inquiry:

http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/issue/view/2/showToc

Share

3 SoTL sessions at the upcoming CACSL conference, May 25-27 at MRU

This year, the TransCanada International Forum on SoTL, sponsored through the Institute for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, will be hosted in partnership with the 2016 Canadian Association of Community Service Learning conference, May 25-27 at Mount Royal University.  The Forum features 3 sessions with leading scholar Patti Clayton:

Session I (Wed, 9:00 – 12:00): Integrating Critical Reflection and Assessment to Generate, Deepen, and Document Learning
In this first of three opportunities to collaboratively explore Community Service-Learning and Community Engagement (CSL/CE) as the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) with practitioner-scholar Patti Clayton, we will focus our attention on designing critical reflection so as to both generate student learning and provide a basis for inquiry into the processes that support such learning. For over 15 years Patti and colleagues around the world have been refining a research grounded model for integrating critical reflection and assessment. This highly interactive session will invite participants to build on their work, co-create critical reflection assignments and rubrics that are well-aligned with shared learning goals, and begin to co-design SoTL questions and methods that tap critical reflection products and processes.

Throughout the session participants will be invited to identify colleagues in the room with similar interests and to explore possible collaboration during the lunch break.

Session II (Wed, 1:30 – 4:00): Revisioning SoTL for Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Who conducts SoTL? And whose learning is in question in SoTL? In this second in a series of three opportunities to collaboratively explore CSL/CE as the scholarship of teaching and learning, Patti Clayton and Janice Miller-Young will invite participants into an international conversation about broadening and deepening the meanings and the practices of SoTL, within and beyond CSL. Patti, Janice, and their colleague Peter Felten are advancing efforts to conceptualize and implement engaged pedagogies as spaces of co-teaching, co-learning, and co-generating knowledge and practice; and they are seeing in trends in this direction indications that it is time to revisit and revise Hutchings and Shulman’s seminal work defining SoTL. SoTL can be a powerful means of developing practitioner-scholars; improving teaching and learning; nurturing communities of inquiry and practice around shared commitments to learners and learning; and building bodies of knowledge, practice, and policy in support of same. To fulfill this potential in the context of engaged pedagogies and to retain its cutting edge orientation as scholarship, they suggest that SoTL can no longer be understood and enacted primarily by faculty as a vehicle to improve student learning and to produce scholarship by and for faculty. This highly interactive session will engage participants in revisioning SoTL in ways that honor CSL/CE’s foundational commitment that everyone involved teaches and learns and that leverage the questions, experiences, and learning of CSL/CE practitioner-scholars to help define the future of SoTL in CSL/CE.

At the end of the day participants will be invited to form pairs or small groups of potential collaborators and to engage in the rest of the conference accordingly (e.g., having meals together, meeting between sessions to share questions and insights).

Session III (Fri, 9:00 – 11:45): Continuing our own SoTL Journeys: Questions, Collaborators, and Next Steps
In this third opportunity to explore CSL/CE as SoTL with Patti and colleagues, we will reflect on related work we have encountered during the conference, examine Canadian examples, and further develop our own questions, collaborations, and inquiry methods. Participants will be invited to skim an article/chapter related to the SoTL interests shared by the pair/small group they formed on Wednesday (examples will be provided) and to bring a worksheet completed during the conference to the session as aids to focusing our time productively. The intended outcome of this concluding gathering in the series of 3 sessions is for participants to leave with specific ideas, collaborators, and next steps in their own journeys with CSL/CE as SoTL.

Share

Developing a SoTL Question

These video presentations from an October SoTL Exchange presentation at MRU have been waiting for a website redesign to find a permanent home, but in the meantime, you can also find them here!   In this series, 6 SoTL scholars talk about what got them interested in their question, their data sources and/or methodology, and their findings and impact, including how their inquiry informed their teaching.

Part 1:  Janice introduces the presenters and a brief description of the Taxonomy of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Questions.

Part 2:  Glen Ryland, Assistant Professor, General Education discusses how he developed and analyzed his SoTL question about what sources and strategies students draw upon as they are developing as academic writers in general education.

Part 3: Margy MacMillan, Professor, Library discusses her project about student reading of scholarly articles, how she used a phenomenographic approach to analyze how students make connections between the text and their existing knowledge, and what she learned about their reading.
Part 4:  April McGrath, Assistant Professor, Psychology describes how she used an experimental design to see how a “learning check-in” (structured one-on-one appointment) could increase student engagement and success in a research methods class, and also how she uncovered useful information about the course topics that students were struggling with.
Part 5:  Melanie Rathburn, Associate Professor, Biology and General Education talks about how she investigated strategies to reduce student anxiety about science and math in her general education courses using surveys and reflective writing, and how she determined that making the content relevant to the students and giving them opportunities to reflect, were important strategies.
Part 6:  Janice Miller-Young, Director, Institute for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, discusses her insights about how students visualize three-dimensional structures from two-dimensional textbook diagrams, which she gained through using a think-aloud interview protocol triangulated with data from students’ coursework.
Share

holiday reading: some examples of Patti Clayton’s work in SoTL-CSL

The DEAL Model for Critical Reflection and Assessment that she co-developed through a long-term SoTL project has formed the basis for several projects/articles:

The first research-grounded one was:
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0011.204/1/–integrating-reflection-and-assessment-to-capture-and-improve?view=image

The following piece is the product of a long-term project grounded in DEAL. This is a primary go-to piece on critical reflection and assessment in experiential learning (which this journal calls “applied learning”):
http://www.missouriwestern.edu/appliedlearning/journalvol1/Ash%20&%20Clayton,%20Generating,%20Deepening,%20and%20Documenting%20Learning.pdf

Also:

An article on a less social-sciency example of a SoTL project can be found at:
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0011.106/–shifts-in-perspective-capitalizing-on-the-counter-normative?view=image&seq=1&size=100

Share

Reminder: Developing a SoTL Research Question presentation

Reminder: The next topic in our SoTL Exchange Presentation Series:

Developing a SoTL Research question
Presented by: Margy MacMillan, April McGrath, Janice Miller-Young, Melanie Rathburn, and Glen Ryland
Thursday, Nov 21 at noon in Y324

 This group presentation will survey a range of types of SoTL questions, then presenters will each describe one of their SoTL projects in terms of how it was conceived, what methodologies and sources of evidence were used, plus findings and impact.  There will be time for discussion and our intent is that anyone interested in learning about SoTL or thinking about developing a SoTL inquiry will find this presentation useful and engaging.

Hope to see you there!

SoTLExchange

Share

Ethical Considerations for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

I’m just putting together a handout of references for the workshop I’m co-presenting this week at the SoTL Symposium.  I know how research ethics is such an exciting topic which everyone LOVES to read about so thought I’d share the list here too  😉

Cheers,
Janice

“The teacher’s responsibility to hold students’ educational interests paramount provides an important perspective when considering ethical issues for research in teaching and learning” (MacLean & Poole, 2010).

Guidance Documents

Panel on Research Ethics. (2010). Tri‐Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Available at www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/Default/

Mount Royal University Human Research Ethics Board (2012) Ethical Considerations for Dual‐Role Research: Conducting Research with Students in your own Classroom. Available at http://www.mtroyal.ca/wcm/groups/public/documents/pdf/dualroleresearchers.pdf

Articles

Healey, R.L., Bass, T., Caulfield, J., Hoffman, A. McGinn, M.K., Miller-Young, J., and Haigh, M. (2013) Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 1(2), pp. 23-33. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.issue-2

MacLean, M., and Poole, G. (2010). An introduction to ethical considerations for novices to research in teaching and learning in Canada. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1(2). Available at http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=cjsotl_rcacea

Pecorino, P.A., Kincaid, S., and Gironda, B. (2008) Research and Experimentation in Teaching Effectiveness: The Ethical Review Process and the IRB. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2(1). Available at http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/int_jtl/23/

Stockley, D. and Balkwill, L. (2013) Raising Awareness of Research Ethics in SoTL: The Role of Educational Developers. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4(1), Article 7.  Available at http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol4/iss1/7

Share

CoP on advancing your SoTL practice – next meeting Nov 1

A group of faculty, who have either been through the Nexen Scholars program or have conducted a SoTL project, are working as a Community of Practice this year to support ourselves in furthering our SoTL work.  For those who are interested but can’t make our meetings, we’ll post brief summaries here.

As a group, we decided that one of our goals was to explore different methodologies in order to expand our perspectives on what kinds of research questions can be asked in SoTL.  At our second meeting on Oct 18, Michelle gave us a nice “big picture” summary of qualitative research which included examples, interests, disciplines, and common terms and features.  I particularly enjoyed how she summed up her presentation as follows:

Empirical Qualitative – the truth is out there
Naturalistic Descriptive – rich description, researcher needs to be keenly observant
Interpretive the context is the story
Critical Theory – interested in power, emancipatory goals
Post-modern, Post-Structuralist – the jazz of qualitative research

Thanks Michelle!

We had such a great discussion that we didn’t quite get to discussing data analysis yet, so to get ready for our next meeting, Michelle has suggested this reading:

Title:  Analyzing Qualitative Data
Author(s):  Margaret D. LeCompte
Source:  Theory into Practice, Vol. 39, No. 3, Getting Good Qualitative Data to Improve Educational Practice  (Summer, 2000), pp. 146-154
Publisher(s): Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL:  
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477546

See you next week, Friday Nov 1, at 2:00 in T195.

Share

CoP on advancing your SoTL practice

A group of faculty, who have either been through the Nexen Scholars program or have conducted a SoTL project, are developing a Community of Practice to support themselves in furthering their SoTL work.  For those who are interested but can’t make our meetings, we’ll post brief summaries here.

At our first meeting last month, 4 main themes emerged from our discussion about what kinds of support everyone was looking for:

  • sharing expertise on conducting collaborative projects
  • exploring methodologies
  • strategizing personal trajectories and developing research programs
  • being a sounding board for members to discuss their current projects

We decided our next meeting would begin with a brief survey (courtesy of Michelle Yeo) of 4 qualitative research paradigms: “empirical” qualitative, interpretive, critical and postmodern.  We thought a discussion of these paradigms might help to broaden our perspectives of what kinds of research questions can be asked in SoTL.  We’ll also be discussing the following article:

Kanuka, H. (2011). Keeping the Scholarship in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1).
http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/int_jtl/252/

Looking forward to seeing where this discussion takes us!

Reminder: our next meeting is Friday Oct 18 at 2:00.

Share