MRU Institute for SoTL

Update – 2017 TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants

Applications for the 2017 TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants are due January 16, 2017. To apply, Principal Investigators must use the Office of Research Services web-based application through ROMEO (see https://mtroyal.ca/Research/romeo ). The information required for the grant application is listed in the ROMEO system.

The Institute for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at MRU is pleased to sponsor a call for applications for the 2017 TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants. These grants are designated for collaborative teaching and learning inquiry projects which go beyond an inquiry about teaching and learning in a single class. Note that while the Nexen Scholars Program is designed to support scholars in developing a project, the TransCanada grants require a complete research proposal including literature review, research question, methodology, data collection, and dissemination plans. (If your proposed work does not align well with this structure, please include a clear statement of theory and methods that are aligned with the proposed project.)

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is inclusive and unified by its potential to have impact in the classroom and to deepen our understanding of student learning, but diverse in discipline, theory, methodology, and method. Eligible projects must propose systematic, evidence-based study of teaching and learning and meet principles of good practice in SoTL (Felten, 2013):

  • focused on student learning in higher education,
  • situated in the existing literature and grounded in a teaching-learning context,
  • methodologically sound,
  • conducted in partnership with students, and
  • appropriately public.

Collaborative SoTL projects are expected to be in the range of $5,000-$10,000 for a single year (bigger than what an internal research grant would reasonably support) and may be conducted over one or two years. Multi-year projects are subject to annual reporting and adequate progress in order to carry forward funds. For multi-institutional projects, a fulltime MRU faculty member must be the principal investigator on the project and paid research assistants must be MRU students (unless the project is co-funded). Note that support for smaller SoTL inquiry projects is available through the Internal Research Grant Fund.

For additional information please contact the Institute for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning through Anne Johnston at ajohnston@mtroyal.ca. These grants are funded in their entirety by the TransCanada Research Program for Learning Innovation and Collaborative Inquiry.

For more information on criteria and eligible expenses, please click Continue reading

Continue reading

Share

new project studying Concept Maps and Flipped Classrooms supported through the TransCanada Collaborative SoTL grants program

We are particularly excited about the potential of this project not only because it is an attempt to redesign a course to address high ‘DFW rates’, but also because of the preliminary groundwork already completed for this research such as piloting the pedagogy and assessment strategies, the initial impact that has already been demonstrated through preliminary data collection, and the planned implementation and collaboration across multiple years of the nursing program.

To see descriptions and updates for this and other projects funded through the TransCanada Learning Innovation and Collaborative Inquiry Research Program, see here.

Impact of Concept Maps and a Flipped Classroom Model in Biology and Nursing
Collaborative Research Team: Michelle Yeo, Academic Development Centre; Sarah Hewitt, Department of Biology; Joanne Bouma, Department of Nursing and Midwifery

Anatomy and Physiology is a year-long, first year course taught in two parts – BIOL 1220 and 1221. This is a service course taught by the Biology Department and is a required course for first year nursing students. This first year anatomy and physiology course has traditionally had one of the highest failure and withdrawal rates at the university. It is an extremely content heavy course, historically taught with a lecture/exam-based model. Students take the course in their first year of the nursing program as a required course. Faculty in the Nursing Program, including co-investigator Joanne Bouma, have repeatedly observed that students who barely pass this course struggle in subsequent courses, especially pathophysiology which they take in their second year. Consequently, there is a lot of impetus to try to improve their understanding of the basic material in the first year.

Based on prior interviews with students, and the observations of faculty teaching the course, the students struggle to find the best approach to learning so much content. Their retention of material beyond the exams is very poor, and for this reason, they are unable to make connections between later concepts that are based on, or identical to, earlier concepts. In an effort to help the students develop a more structured approach to learning, retaining information, and making connections between concepts, Sarah Hewitt decided to radically alter the course delivery in the sections she was teaching. In consultation with Michelle Yeo, Hewitt re-configured the course by amalgamating shortened lectures and in-class group work, with some typical components of a flipped classroom – more work outside of class time that allows for more student engagement activities in class. The biggest change involved the development of skeleton concept maps. Von Der Heidt (2015) argues that concept mapping can powerfully contribute to deep learning for students. Furthermore, a series of video lectures were created that students watched outside the class and could view them repeatedly as needed.

Calls have been made in the literature for research to help build an evidence base to justify the implementation of flipped approaches, and to increase their effectiveness through a better understanding of what does and does not work (Vickrey et al. 2015). Our SoTL work intends to discover how well these new approaches in BIOL 1220&21 are working and why. Furthermore, a recent study (Van Vliet, Winnips, & Brouwer, 2015) suggests that the benefits of a flipped model are not maintained if the pedagogy is not continued. Thus the GOALS of this project are as follows:

1. To assess the success of the partially flipped classroom as a teaching tool in first year,
2. To see whether this method can be used in the follow-up pathophysiology course in second year, and finally,
3. To find out whether the combination of this teaching method on both first and second year courses is an effective way for the students to more thoroughly learn the material, increase their long term retention of concepts and/or their ability to apply the concepts in a clinical setting.

We are proposing a two-year project to accomplish these goals. The project represents a partnership between three faculty members from Biology, Nursing, and the Academic Development Centre.

Share

New SoTL projects supported in Fall 2015

We are thrilled to announce the recipients of our latest round of TransCanada Grants and Nexen Scholars Program applications (more details here).  The projects cover topics from undergraduate research in science to humanities, and from developing students’ interprofessional skills to civic and global engagement. They will be conducted by faculty collaborating across disciplines and institutions.  We’re looking forward to learning from what they learn about student learning!!

 

TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants awarded Fall 2015

(see the Institute’s main website for project descriptions)

Interprofessional Education with Nursing and Respiratory Therapy Students: A Mixed Methods Study.

  • Collaborative Research Team: Heather Russell, Margot Underwood, Marg Olfert, Liza Choi, Stephanie Zettel, Jennifer Watson, and Caroline Silen (Nursing, Mount Royal University; Meredith Patey and Jennifer Stefura (Respiratory Therapy, SAIT)

How do Students Understand Community-Service Learning?

  • Collaborative Research Team: Melanie Rathburn and Roberta Lexier (General Education)

 

2016 Nexen Scholars and their projects

John Chik, Chemistry & Physics: REAL (Real Experience And Learning) Labs: Designing Authentic Learning Experiences in Biochemistry

Ana Colina, Biology: What is the impact of web-based pre-laboratory preparation modules on learning in the microbiology laboratory?

Lee Easton, English:  Screening Identities: Exploring How Film Studies Students use Canadian Identities at/on the Border of Race, Nation and History

Heather MacLean, Nursing & Midwifery: How students experience learning in simulation from both active participant and observer roles

Teresa Merrells, Humanities: Studying Undergraduate Research in a Course on Language Acquisition

Semiyu Aderibigbe and Rita Yembilah, General Education: Using an Online Discussion Platform to Engage Students in General Education Courses about Communities and Societies

Share

application details for upcoming Nexen Scholars Program and TransCanada Collaborative SoTL grants

Our redesigned home website will launch soon (can’t wait!) but in the meantime I wanted to get these RFPs posted as soon as possible:

2016 Nexen Scholars Program

The Nexen Scholars Program brings together faculty from a range of academic disciplines committed to investigating and documenting significant issues and challenges in teaching and learning in higher education. The central work of the Nexen Scholars is to develop course-based inquiry projects, conduct research that sheds new light on a significant aspect of student learning, and share evidence and findings publicly in an effort to influence practice in the field.

Nexen Scholars are selected for a 16-month term, participate in an off‐site residency in February, and engage in monthly collaborative activities during the time that they develop and conduct their inquiries. The Nexen donation also supports Going Public Awards for scholars to present their work at conferences, as well as an optional data analysis residencies to assist scholars in furthering their work.

2016 Nexen Program Call for Proposals (due Dec 1 2015)2016nexenscholarsrfp

Nexen Scholars Going Public Awards2015-16GoingPublic

Faculty who are considering applying are encouraged, but not required, to attend the following November presentation and to browse the Institute website for resources and information about previous projects:

Nexen Program Scholars’ Showcase
Fri Nov 6 2015, 12:30-1:30 in T107

Presented by 2015 Nexen Scholars: Collette Lemieux (Bissett), Brad Quiring (Bissett), Sheri Rhodes (International Education), Joanna Szabo (Nursing), Priscilla Wamucii (General Education), and Janice Miller-Young (Institute)

TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants

TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grants are designated for collaborative teaching and learning inquiry projects which go beyond an inquiry about teaching and learning in a single class. Note that while the Nexen Scholars Program is designed to support scholars in developing a project, the TransCanada grants require a complete research proposal including literature review, research question, methodology, data collection, and dissemination plans. (If your proposed work does not align well with this structure, please include a clear statement of theory and methods that are aligned with the proposed project.) Eligible projects must propose systematic, evidence-based study of teaching and learning and meet principles of good practice in SoTL (Felten, 2013).

Collaborative SoTL projects are expected to be in the range of $5,000-$10,000 (i.e. bigger than what an internal research grant would reasonably support) and may be conducted over one or two years.

TransCanada grant application guidelines (due October 31): Collaborative-Research-Grant-guidelines-updated Sept2015

To apply for TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry Grant, Principal Investigators must use the Office of Research Services web-based application, which requires the completion of a Research Tracking Form, description of the project, co-investigator team and dissemination plan, and the uploading of a complete research proposal.

Share

MRU scholars presenting at #STLHE2015

A number of us from MRU are presenting at Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education conference next week.  Looking forward to the generative conversations that will occur!

Wed June 17, 12:00 pm, Seymour Room
Tuning in on Tacit Knowledge
Jennifer Boman, Genevieve Currie, Ron MacDonald, Janice Miller-Young, Michelle Yeo, Stephanie Zettel

Thurs June 18, 11:30 am, Seymour Room
Creating SoTL Concertos for Institutional Impact
Michelle Yeo representing MRU on a panel with colleagues from University of Calgary, University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, McMaster University, Western University, Brock University, and University of Waterloo

Fri June 19, 8:30 am, Salon 2
Tuning in to Original Undergraduate Research in Classroom Contexts
Karen Manarin, April McGrath, Miriam Carey

Fri June 19, 8:30 am, Cypress 1 Room
Writing and publishing your Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Janice Miller-Young on a panel with other CJSoTL editors Shannon Murray, Marilou Bélisle, and Beth Marquis

**also see the SoTL Canada blog for a schedule of other SoTL presentations and the SoTL Canada AGM

Share

What Students Want You to Know About Conducting SoTL Research

A video of this fantastic keynote at last year’s SoTL Symposium is now online – thank you to Ana Sepulveda, Ranee Drader and Margy MacMillan for sharing their experiences and perspectives about how students can contribute to SoTL work, what they learn, and how faculty can help make it as positive an experience as possible!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILNOIq4ycGg&feature=youtu.be

Abstract:

These two scholarship of teaching and learning undergraduate student co-investigators talk about why they got involved in SoTL research, describe the projects they’ve worked on and what they’ve learned, and share their perspectives on how faculty and students can work together toward improving student learning. Some key themes from their talk include how they now have a better understanding of what research is and what universities do, how much they were inspired and excited by doing the research and gained confidence by being able to add value to a research project, and also how it taught them life skills such as developing time management skills, learning that setbacks are okay, and balancing work/life/school. However, they also discussed some of the challenges of being in a dual role of a research assistant working for their own professors. Their advice for faculty: be patient and remember that undergraduate students are just learning about research; make students feel comfortable bringing up new ideas yet provide constructive criticism; be flexible and realize that your students still have a life outside of school; realize that the relationship you develop will be different than a professor/student relationship; and remember the importance of place – having a dedicated space and community on campus for doing their work is important for them not only to focus but also to feel supported rather than isolated.

Share

TransCanada Collaborative SoTL grants awarded this round

It’s so nice to announce good news!!  Congratulations to the following colleagues who will be conducting these important, interesting, and ambitious Collaborative SoTL projects funded by the TransCanada Collaborative Research Program:

Journalism Identity Study, Phase 2
Collaborative Research Team: Amanda Williams, Victoria Guglietti, Sally Haney (Journalism)

This project represents Phase 2 of a collaborative investigation examining the central research question: How do students form a concept of themselves as journalists throughout their undergraduate journalism degree program? In Phase 1 of the investigation, the research team completed a thematic analysis of more than 90 semi-guided student reflections gathered in all four years of the journalism program at Mount Royal University. The study not only revealed what student journalists were saying about their experiences, it also informed the research team’s decision to proceed with the second leg of the study. In Phase 2 of the investigation, the research team is using a narrative approach to guide qualitative interviews with several study participants. Given the privileged place that “stories” holds in the discipline, the interviews will be conducted with students as a means of understanding their identity vis-à-vis their stories. It is expected that by gaining a better appreciation of how students understand themselves in their journeys through the journalism program and in the context of their views of journalism, journalism educators will be in a better position to develop constructive pedagogical interventions that address points of anxiety, stress, disjuncture or frustration in the identity formation process. One or two student research assistants will be employed on this project to assist with analyzing the interviews using qualitative methods and presenting the findings at a conference.

 

Student Experience and Impact of Clinical Presentations in the Athletic Therapy Curriculum
Collaborative Research Team: Mark Lafave, Kjatija Westbrook, Dennis Valdez, Breda Eubank, Jenelle McAllister (Health and Physical Education); Michelle Yeo (Academic Development Centre)

Competency-based education in medical and allied healthcare professions has become accepted as commonplace. The Athletic Therapy program at Mount Royal University has undergone a transformation from a more traditional delivery method to one that employs a clinical presentation (CP) model of competency-based education. A CP model of curriculum is similar to problem-based learning (PBL) delivery whereby clinical cases or diagnoses are central to the teaching and learning process. A CP model is unique from PBL in that students are taught to think more like experts, whereby both inductive and deductive reasoning approaches are employed. Specifically, students are taught schemata that are employed by experts to evaluate, diagnose, manage, and treat various neurological and orthopedic-related conditions or CPs. A schemata is essentially a cognitive script and process that expert uses to help evaluate, manage and treat injuries or conditions. Experts employ schemata subconsciously and thus, it is important to make what is happens seamlessly and implicitly for them more explicit to the student. Metaphorically, it is like teaching students to use a road map to get from one point to another. We have completed research that identified 253 CPs that should be part of an undergraduate curriculum. Ideally, if students understand the 253 CPs, it should lead to a competent Athletic Therapist upon graduation. The proposed research aims to determine if the CP model of competency-based education effectively teaches students to be ‘competent,’ as intended. Furthermore, understanding the student experience with these clinical presentations help describe a learning curve in AT. A student Research Assistant will contribute substantially to this project by assisting with data collection, analysis and dissemination of findings.

Share

Reminder: Next SoTL presentation Tuesday March 17 on Scaffolding Undergraduate Research

Effects of a Scaffolded Approach to Undergraduate Research
Presented by:
Karen Manarin, Departments of English and General Education
Miriam Carey, Academic Development Centre
April McGrath, Department of Psychology

If undergraduate research leads to significant learning gains, should it be available to all students as part of the regular curriculum? Karen Manarin, Miriam Carey and April McGrath explore the effects of a scaffolded approach to undergraduate research in a 4th year English class, a 1st year General Education class, and a 2nd year Psychology class in this collaborative scholarship of teaching and learning project.

 

Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Noon – 1:00 p.m.
Room Y324

No registration required — everyone welcome!
Come and join in the conversation about teaching and learning.

Share

Research Associate position – call for expressions of interest!

The Institute for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning seeks to engage Mount Royal University faculty in teaching-learning related scholarship, to cultivate interdisciplinary communities of practice and collaborations, and to contribute to the existing body of scholarship about teaching and learning in higher education. In pursuit of these goals, the Institute’s current programming includes the Nexen Scholars Program, the TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Inquiry grants, a number of facilitated communities of practice on special topics, and an annual conference and forum.

 

Position Description

The Institute for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is seeking expressions of interest from full-time MRU faculty members to serve as a Research Associate for a two-year term.  The primary responsibility of this position will be to take a leadership role in an emerging, interdisciplinary research theme in the field of SoTL, such as undergraduate research. Other minor roles and responsibilities will include assisting with the Nexen Scholars Program, the TransCanada Collaborative SoTL Grant selection process, help with the organization and delivery of I-SoTL events, and occupying an ex-officio position on the I-SoTL Advisory Committee.  Other duties and responsibilities, by mutual consent between the Director and the faculty member and commensurate with amount of reassigned time allocated, may be assigned as need arises. The Research Associate will receive one course of teaching release per year (to be approved by the relevant Dean and Department Head). The work of the Research Associate contributes to the service portion of their work pattern.

Term of Appointment

The term of appointment will be from August 15, 2015 until June 15, 2017.

 

The ideal candidate will possess:

  • experience leading interdisciplinary SoTL research projects
  • knowledge of emerging trends and current literature in interdisciplinary SoTL (eg. undergraduate research)
  • a record of scholarship and engagement in the international SoTL community

 

Interested individuals should submit a cover letter highlighting their relevant background and interest, and current CV to Janice Miller-Young  at jmyoung[at]mtroyal.ca by 4:30 pm on March 27, 2015.

Please also indicate that you have discussed this with your Dean and whether the Dean is supportive.

Share